Skip to content

Constructing Persuasive Proposal Arguments: Examples & Sample Essay

Proposal Argument
A proposal (predictive) argument is a type of persuasive writing where the author suggests a solution or course of action to address a specific problem or issue. It aims to convince the audience that the proposed solution is both feasible and beneficial.

Here are sample proposal argument essays for college students:

Sample Proposal Argument Essay on Reusable Containers

Sample Proposal Argument Essay on Workplace Wellness

General Outline

Problem-Solution Pattern
Proposal arguments generally apply a problem-solution pattern. Here is a suggested outline:

  1. Introduction:
    • Engaging opening sentence or hook to grab the reader’s attention.
    • Provide background information on the problem or issue being addressed.
    • Present a clear thesis statement that states the proposed solution or course of action.
  2. Problem Statement:
    • Clearly define the problem or condition that needs to be addressed.
    • Provide context and background information to help the reader understand the issue.
    • Explain the significance and impact of the problem on individuals or society.
  3. Problem Analysis:
    • Present evidence and examples that demonstrate the existence and prevalence of the problem.
    • Use data, statistics, research findings, or expert opinions to support your claims.
    • Discuss the consequences or negative effects of the problem if left unaddressed.
  4. Alternative Solutions:
    • Present multiple solutions or approaches to address the problem.
    • Describe each solution, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.
    • Provide evidence or examples to support the viability of each option.
  5. Proposed Solution:
    • Introduce the selected solution and explain why it is the best choice among the alternatives.
    • Explain how the proposed solution directly addresses the identified problem. Use logical reasoning and persuasive techniques to convince the reader that your solution is effective and feasible.
    • Anticipate and address counterarguments or potential objections to strengthen your argument.
  6. Benefits and Justifications (optional):
    • Discuss the benefits and advantages of implementing the proposed solution.
    • Provide evidence, examples, or logical reasoning to support your claims.
    • Address potential counterarguments and refute them with solid reasoning and evidence.
  7. Implementation Plan (optional):
    • Outline a detailed plan for implementing the proposed solution.
    • Discuss the steps, resources, and timeline required for successful implementation.
    • Address any potential challenges or obstacles that may arise during implementation.
  8. Conclusion:
    • Summarize the main points of your proposal argument.
    • Reinforce the importance and benefits of accepting the proposed solution.
    • Call for action or urge the reader to support the implementation of the proposed solution.

Remember to adapt this outline to your specific essay requirements and topic. Make sure to provide strong evidence, logical reasoning, and persuasive language throughout the essay to support your proposal argument effectively.

Developing an Effective Thesis Statement

A proposal argument thesis statement is used to present a specific solution or plan of action to address a particular issue or problem.

Here’s a template for a proposal argument thesis statement:

“In order to [address the issue or problem], we propose [your specific solution or plan of action], which will [explain the benefits and expected outcomes of your proposal].”

Let’s break down this template:

  1. Start with the issue or problem: Clearly identify the problem or issue that you intend to address with your proposal.
  2. Present your solution or plan: Describe your specific proposal for solving the problem or addressing the issue. Your proposal should be actionable and well-defined.
  3. Explain the benefits and expected outcomes: Highlight the positive results or benefits that can be expected from implementing your proposal.

Here’s an example using the template:

“In order to reduce traffic congestion and promote sustainable transportation in our city, we propose the expansion of public transportation systems, including more frequent bus services, the introduction of light rail, and improved bike lanes. This comprehensive plan will ease traffic, reduce air pollution, and provide citizens with environmentally friendly commuting options, ultimately creating a more livable and eco-conscious urban environment.”

This thesis statement outlines the issue (traffic congestion and sustainability), presents the proposal (expanding public transportation and improving bike lanes), and explains the expected benefits (reducing traffic, cutting air pollution, and enhancing eco-friendliness). It sets the stage for an essay that will provide further details and support for the proposed solution.

Identifying & Avoiding the Strawman Fallacy

While there are several logical fallacies to avoid when writing a proposal argument, the strawman fallacy is the most common reasoning error in these arguments. It occurs when a person misrepresents or distorts their opponent’s argument in order to make it easier to attack. Below is an example of this fallacy in an argument and how to strengthen the argument:

  1. Example of Strawman Fallacy in a Proposal Argument:
    Here’s an example of strawman fallacy in a proposal argument and how to construct a better argument:

    • Opposing viewpoint: “We should invest more in renewable energy sources to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and combat climate change.”
    • Fallacious (strawman) proposal argument as construed by the opponent: “We should completely abandon all forms of fossil fuels immediately and rely solely on renewable energy.”

    In this example, the person misrepresents the opposing viewpoint by exaggerating it to an extreme position. This strawman fallacy makes it easier to attack the argument by presenting it as unrealistic and impractical.

  2. Formulating a Better Proposal Argument:
    Here is how to construct a better proposal argument  based on the above example of a strawman fallacy:

    • Improved proposal argument – opposing viewpoint: “We should invest more in renewable energy sources and gradually decrease our reliance on fossil fuels to reduce our carbon emissions and mitigate climate change.”
    • Better proposal argument – opponent: “We should continue relying heavily on fossil fuels and ignore renewable energy options.”

    In the improved argument, the opposing viewpoint is accurately represented, and the argument is addressed in a fair and honest manner. This allows for a more productive discussion and a stronger proposal argument.

  3. Strengthening this Proposal Argument Example:
    To further strengthen the proposal argument example provided above, consider the following points:

    1. Present clear evidence: Support the benefits of investing in renewable energy sources and the negative impacts of continued reliance on fossil fuels with factual data, research studies, and expert opinions. This strengthens your argument and highlights the need for change.
    2. Address feasibility: Acknowledge any concerns about the feasibility of transitioning to renewable energy sources and provide evidence of successful cases and technological advancements. Show that the proposed solution is practical and achievable.
    3. Consider economic implications: Discuss the economic advantages of investing in renewable energy, such as job creation, reduced dependence on volatile fuel prices, and long-term cost savings. Address any potential economic concerns raised by the opposing viewpoint and present counterarguments based on economic analysis.
    4. Highlight environmental benefits: Emphasize the positive environmental impact of transitioning to renewable energy, such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions, improved air quality, and conservation of natural resources. Explain how these benefits align with long-term sustainability goals.
    5. Address energy security: Respond to concerns about energy security and potential instability associated with a shift away from fossil fuels. Discuss how diversifying the energy mix and investing in renewable sources can enhance energy security and resilience.

By constructing a better argument, addressing the opposing viewpoint accurately and respectfully, and providing strong evidence and reasoning, your proposal argument will be more persuasive and effective in advocating for your proposed solution.

Guidelines on Eliminating Fallacies in Proposal Arguments

Avoiding Fallacies
Avoiding fallacies is crucial when constructing a proposal argument. To ensure that you avoid fallacies and maintain the integrity of your proposal argument, consider the following guidelines:

  1. Understand the opposing viewpoint: Take the time to thoroughly understand the opposing perspective. This involves engaging with their arguments, reading their literature, and considering their reasoning. Avoid oversimplifying or misinterpreting their position.
  2. Represent the opposing viewpoint accurately: When presenting the opposing argument, accurately represent its core points and ideas. Avoid exaggeration or distortion. Use direct quotes or paraphrasing to ensure accuracy.
  3. Focus on the strongest arguments: Instead of selecting weaker or fringe arguments from the opposing viewpoint, address the most compelling ones. By engaging with the strongest points, you demonstrate intellectual honesty and credibility.
  4. Refute the actual argument: When refuting the opposing viewpoint, respond to the arguments as they were originally presented. Avoid creating a weaker or distorted version of their position to make it easier to dismiss. This way, your counterarguments will directly address the real concerns.
  5. Use evidence and logical reasoning: Support your counterarguments with evidence, logical reasoning, and examples. Relying on sound evidence will strengthen your proposal argument and make it more persuasive.
  6. Seek clarification and dialogue: If you’re unsure about an opposing argument, reach out to the individuals or sources that presented it. Engage in respectful dialogue to clarify their position and ensure your understanding is accurate. This approach fosters a more constructive and informed discussion.
  7. Acknowledge valid points: If the opposing viewpoint presents valid concerns or points, acknowledge them. It demonstrates intellectual honesty and helps build credibility for your proposal. However, clearly explain why your proposed solution is still the most effective and beneficial one.

By avoiding logical fallacies in your proposal argument, you can maintain the integrity of your discussion and engage in a more productive and respectful exchange of ideas. Remember to accurately represent the opposing viewpoint, focus on strong arguments, and support your claims with evidence and logical reasoning.

10 Effective Proposal Argument Examples

Here are ten examples of proposal arguments, each broken down to individual supportive claims:

  1. Proposal Argument on Implementing Stricter Gun Control Measures:
    • Definition Claim: Clearly define the problem of gun violence and its impact on society.
    • Existence Claim: Present evidence and statistics on the prevalence of gun-related crimes.
    • Consequence Claim: Explain the consequences of inadequate gun control, such as mass shootings and high homicide rates.
    • Proposal Claim: Propose stricter gun control measures, such as comprehensive background checks, limitations on high-capacity magazines, and closing loopholes.
    • Feasibility Claim: Present evidence and examples of successful gun control policies implemented in other countries.
    • Evaluative Claim: Argue that stricter gun control measures will help reduce gun violence and promote public safety.
  2. Proposal Argument on Implementing Mandatory Recycling Programs in Schools:
    • Definition Claim: Define the problem of excessive waste generation and its environmental impact.
    • Existence Claim: Present data on the amount of waste generated in schools and its contribution to landfill waste.
    • Consequence Claim: Explain the consequences of insufficient recycling efforts, such as pollution and resource depletion.
    • Proposal Claim: Propose the implementation of mandatory recycling programs in schools, including education, recycling bins, and waste reduction initiatives.
    • Feasibility Claim: Provide examples of successful recycling programs in schools and their positive outcomes.
    • Evaluative Claim: Argue that mandatory recycling programs will instill environmentally responsible habits in students and contribute to a sustainable future.
  3. Proposal Argument on Introducing Comprehensive Sex Education in Schools:
    • Definition Claim: Define the problem of inadequate sex education and its impact on students’ health and well-being.
    • Existence Claim: Present data on the prevalence of teen pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, and misinformation about sexual health.
    • Consequence Claim: Explain the negative consequences of insufficient sex education, such as risky behaviors and negative health outcomes.
    • Proposal Claim: Propose the introduction of comprehensive sex education in schools, including age-appropriate information on reproductive health, consent, and healthy relationships.
    • Feasibility Claim: Provide evidence of the effectiveness of comprehensive sex education in reducing risky behaviors and promoting informed decision-making.
    • Evaluative Claim: Argue that comprehensive sex education will empower students with accurate information, promote healthy behaviors, and reduce negative health outcomes.
  4. Proposal Argument on Implementing Workplace Flexibility Policies for Better Work-Life Balance:
    • Definition Claim: Define the problem of work-life imbalance and its negative effects on employees’ well-being and productivity.
    • Existence Claim: Present data on the prevalence of work-related stress, burnout, and the impact on mental health.
    • Consequence Claim: Explain the consequences of inadequate work-life balance, such as decreased job satisfaction and higher turnover rates.
    • Proposal Claim: Propose the implementation of workplace flexibility policies, such as flexible work hours, remote work options, and family-friendly leave policies.
    • Feasibility Claim: Provide examples of companies that have successfully implemented workplace flexibility policies and experienced positive outcomes.
    • Evaluative Claim: Argue that workplace flexibility policies will improve employee morale, productivity, and overall well-being.
  5. Proposal Argument on Implementing Community Policing Programs for Enhanced Police-Community Relations:
    • Definition Claim: Define the problem of strained police-community relations and the lack of trust between communities and law enforcement.
    • Existence Claim: Present examples and incidents that highlight instances of police misconduct or racial bias.
    • Consequence Claim: Explain the negative consequences of poor police-community relations, such as increased crime rates, lack of cooperation, and social unrest.
    • Proposal Claim: Propose the implementation of community policing programs that prioritize building relationships, improving communication, and engaging with the community.
    • Feasibility Claim: Provide examples of successful community policing programs implemented in other regions and their positive impact on crime prevention and community satisfaction.
    • Evaluative Claim: Argue that implementing community policing programs will foster trust, enhance cooperation, and improve overall safety by creating a collaborative environment between law enforcement and the community.
  6. Proposal Argument on Implementing Mental Health Education in Schools:
    • Definition Claim: Define the problem of inadequate mental health awareness and the stigma surrounding mental health issues.
    • Existence Claim: Present data on the prevalence of mental health disorders among students and the negative impact on academic performance and overall well-being.
    • Consequence Claim: Explain the consequences of untreated mental health issues, such as increased suicide rates and long-term psychological challenges.
    • Proposal Claim: Propose the implementation of comprehensive mental health education in schools, including awareness, de-stigmatization, and resources for seeking help.
    • Feasibility Claim: Provide examples of successful mental health education programs in schools and their positive outcomes in terms of early intervention and support.
    • Evaluative Claim: Argue that mental health education in schools will promote emotional well-being, reduce stigma, and improve students’ ability to cope with challenges.
  7. Proposal Argument on Implementing a Tax Incentive Program for Renewable Energy Adoption:
    • Definition Claim: Define the problem of climate change and the need for transitioning to renewable energy sources.
    • Existence Claim: Present scientific evidence on the impact of greenhouse gas emissions and the role of fossil fuels in climate change.
    • Consequence Claim: Explain the consequences of inaction, such as rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and environmental degradation.
    • Proposal Claim: Propose the implementation of a tax incentive program that encourages individuals and businesses to adopt renewable energy technologies.
    • Feasibility Claim: Provide examples of successful tax incentive programs in other regions or countries that have resulted in increased renewable energy adoption.
    • Evaluative Claim: Argue that a tax incentive program for renewable energy adoption will accelerate the transition to clean energy, reduce carbon emissions, and promote sustainable development.
  8. Proposal Argument on Implementing Food Waste Reduction Strategies in Restaurants:
    • Definition Claim: Define the problem of food waste and its impact on environmental sustainability and resource wastage.
    • Existence Claim: Present data on the amount of food wasted by restaurants and its contribution to overall food waste.
    • Consequence Claim: Explain the consequences of food waste, such as increased greenhouse gas emissions and wasted resources.
    • Proposal Claim: Propose the implementation of food waste reduction strategies in restaurants, including portion control, donation programs, and composting initiatives.
    • Feasibility Claim: Provide examples of successful food waste reduction programs in the restaurant industry and their positive impact on sustainability and cost savings.
    • Evaluative Claim: Argue that implementing food waste reduction strategies in restaurants will contribute to environmental sustainability, reduce costs, and promote responsible consumption.
  9. Proposal Argument on Implementing Workplace Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives:
    • Definition Claim: Define the problem of lack of diversity and inclusion in the workplace.
    • Existence Claim: Present data on the underrepresentation of certain groups in the workforce and the negative impact of biases and discrimination.
    • Consequence Claim: Explain the consequences of a lack of diversity and inclusion, such as limited perspectives, decreased innovation, and reduced employee satisfaction.
    • Proposal Claim: Propose the implementation of workplace diversity and inclusion initiatives, including recruitment practices, training programs, and creating inclusive work environments.
    • Feasibility Claim: Provide examples of organizations that have successfully implemented diversity and inclusion initiatives and experienced positive outcomes in terms of employee engagement and business performance.
    • Evaluative Claim: Argue that implementing workplace diversity and inclusion initiatives will foster a more inclusive and equitable work environment, enhance innovation, and improve organizational success.
  10. Proposal Argument on Implementing Comprehensive Financial Literacy Education in Schools:
    • Definition Claim: Define the problem of financial illiteracy and its impact on individuals’ financial well-being and society as a whole.
    • Existence Claim: Present data on the lack of basic financial knowledge among students and the consequences, such as high debt levels and poor financial decision-making.
    • Consequence Claim: Explain the negative consequences of financial illiteracy, such as limited economic mobility, predatory lending, and the cycle of debt.
    • Proposal Claim: Propose the implementation of comprehensive financial literacy education in schools, including personal finance management, budgeting, savings, and investment principles.
    • Feasibility Claim: Provide examples of successful financial literacy programs implemented in schools and their positive outcomes, such as improved financial behaviors and increased savings rates.
    • Evaluative Claim: Argue that implementing comprehensive financial literacy education will empower students with essential financial skills, promote financial well-being, and contribute to long-term economic stability.

Remember, the key to writing a successful proposal argument is to clearly define the problem, propose a solution or course of action, and provide strong and compelling evidence to support your proposal. It’s essential to address potential objections and demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of your proposal to persuade your audience effectively.